John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and The Secret Society Speech

June 4th, 1963- On that day John F Kennedy, President of the United States, signed executive order 11110 which should have returned to the U.S. government the power to issue currency Without Going Through the Federal Reserve, giving the Treasury the power to issue silver certificates against any silver bullion, silver or standard silver in the Treasury. This meant that for every amount of silver the government could introduce new money into circulation, and it would have brought 4.3 billion dollars into circulation. These facts can not be disputed, and neither can the fact that five months later, John Fitzgerald Kennedy, the last President of The United States; was dead.

To be the leader of a free people in a sovereign nation, one can not be beholden to the whims of foreign manipulations of currency. For if one is able to issue and control a nation's currency, it matters not at all who writes that nation's laws. John Fitzgeral Kennedy knew that for the fact that it is, and therefore, was the last President of the United States of America. With his passing, so too did the nation known as the United States of America pass. The outline of the nation is somewhat intact, and many of the citizens are still living, but that nation died with Kennedy; and has never had a leader or a President since his time that wasn't beholden to European bankers, and David Rockefeller.

If one listens to the words of the speech, it becomes abundantly obvious that the "monolithic conspiracy that relies on covet means" is not only the global government agenda pushed by bankers and media moguls, but that such a conspiracy, obviously, is being aided by United States politicians, and business interests, who's actual interests are global in nature, and altogether contrary to the interests and well being of citizens here at home.

Joseph P. Kennedy, the father of the assassinated John Fitzgerald Kennedy, and his equally ambitious, and exceedingly courageous brother, Robert, or "Bobby" Kennedy (R.F.K.), had been the American Ambassador to the United Kingdom prior to, and during World War Two. An exceedingly wealthy man, Joseph had become a political force, and with the wealth to make himself heard, was often at odds with then President, Franklin D. Roosevelt. Mr. Kennedy has often been made into a villain by historians for his very vocal positions during the time leading up to World War Two. As the father of nine Children, Kennedy was very adamant that none of his children should be subjected to war for a European problem. He was a total isolationist, and a great friend of Nevil Chamberlain, the pacifist Prime Minister who'd tried to appease Hitler to achieve what he thought would be "peace in our time."

Things that have to be remembered concerning "The Ambassador," as Joseph P. Kennedy was forever afterwards known, are casually disregarded in popular culture, and even the more biased "historical" works or comments that I've seen. Joseph P. Kennedy had aligned himself with Isolationism and appeasement. He wasn't a seer, and so his very personal, and logical ideas concerning what were definitely European problems that should have been solved by Europeans are now looked at as having been a failed strategy. Even worse, Winston Churchill, a villainous Rothschild minion if there ever was one, with a speaking ability the equal of the then United States Naval Officer, John Fitzgerald Kennedy - is looked upon by history as if he hadn't helped engineer the sinking of the Lusitania.

As it stands today, Churchill is not thought of as the accomplice to the murder of American citizens - but that is what he was. Chamberlain and Kennedy's appeasement failed, and so they are looked at as cowards. That J.P. Kennedy and Nevil Chamberlain were cowardly is contrary to the meme that hindsight is 20/20. Hindsight, I tell you, is the history written by victors, and isn't always representative of the truth at all.

So Joseph Patrick Kennedy Sr. was often called a "casual anti Semite," but this is not true. There is no such thing as a casual racist, one is either a racists, or is not a racist. Opposing sending your children to war does NOT make you a racist. Are "white" American soldiers who fought against Italians and Germans considered anti "white?" No, they are NOT, as that would be completely illogical. So it is also illogical to call someone an "anti Semite" for opposing Ashkenazi Jews controlling the entire world's central banking systems, and mass media. After all, had the Nazis won the second world war, we'd surely have Germans running those institutions instead, but there'd be little cry, and little slander applied to those who would bemoan such monopolies. Why is this? Because history and implied reality are created by the victors. It was never the world's job to send it's sons and daughters to die for Israel, or for Jews living anywhere - and opposing sending your children to war to save Israel or European Jews does not make you an "anti Semite," it makes you sane.

Hate, my friends, is like porn - you know it when you see it. Nobody ever accused Joseph P. Kennedy of being a hateful man.

While it can and has been said that the "Secret Societies" speech by the late president John F. Kennedy has been taken out of it's proper context to misrepresent the modern conspiracy theorist's own ideals. I assure you that this is not true. I've been told that this speech "clearly is about communism."

I couldn't ask for someone to make a better conclusion, for the Communist too sought to create a one world system of government. The communist too were controlled by the same entity that controls the current one world government ideal, the ideal of big money, and corporate interests ruling our world in favor of rule by common people. Should one take the time to dissect the interwoven pieces of history that can not be disputed, then one can clearly see how then ties to now, and that it is all the same.

1 . Abraham Lincoln sought to destroy European control of America through Ashkenazi Jewish banks, and he did so. Lincoln had famously stated that of the Southern Army before him, and the banks behind him - he feared the banks much more than the Southern Army. The European bankers had tried to force Lincoln to borrow money at well over twenty percent interest rates in order to fight the South. Lincoln printed his own, debt free money, the likes of which are an abomination to Zionist.

2. When Rothschild dominated nations such as the United Kingdom and France sought to aide the Confederate states militarily, the Tzar or Russia, also free of Rothschild banking institutions at that time, sent his entire pacific fleet to aid Lincoln, and prevent such aide from tipping the tide militarily, in the Confederate state's favor. Not only that, but the Tzar issued a statement that such aide by France or England to the Southern states would be considered by Russia a declaration of War against Russia. The Tzar, time and again fought attempts by the Rothschilds to set up a central bank in his nation.

3 . The Romanov family of the Russian Tzar time and again thwarted the imperialistic world governance plans of the Rothschilds, and at the "Congress of Vienna" the threat was made that the entire Romanov family would be killed. We all know that this is indeed what happened, but much later during the communist Revolution in Russia.

4.  "Both the Tsar Nicolas and Lincoln were killed by the Zionists Rothschild family.

Before lending Banks existed the wealth of the world was held entirely by Monarchs. The Rothschilds orchestrated revolution after revolution to dispose of these monarchies and replace their monarchical ruled monetary systems with a Rothschild controlled Central Bank. The Central Bank system relied upon tax receipts to pay the interest on the money lent to these Nations. As we have today with the US Federal Reserve as well as the majority of the World's central banks with the exception of Cuba, Iran, Libya (just recently taken over), North Korea, Sudan and Venezuela.

This began first with the intrusion by the Rothschild funded Zionists in the Illuminati order in Bavaria leading to the French Revolution. And the Rothschilds soon afterwards opening a bank branch there.

Tsar Nicolas and the Romanov family were the last European Monarchy to have been overthrown and control of the Russian monetary system replaced with a Rothschild controlled central bank as a result of the Bolshevic revolution. It too had been funded by the Rothschilds banksters via Jacob Schiff, CEO of Kuhn & Loeb Bank, who were also later one of the owners of our very own Federal Reserve Bank. "

Leo Trotsky ...

In conclusion, I'd like to state the obvious - that the John Fitzgerald Kennedy "Secret Society" speech was about communism, and a whole lot more. The Secret Society speech was about the world that we do live in, and of course, the conspiracy did not start and end with communism - communism was just one part of the Hegelian Dialectical model of the world that we live in today. Failing to recognize a massive Ashkenazi Jewish conspiracy centered around but not limited to the Rothschild family, is a plain denial of facts. Again, and for all time - racism is beneath the dignity of any intelligent human, but that does not preclude ethnic conspiracies from existing, and it certainly does not mean that all members of any ethnic group are part of the dominant and controlling minority of that group. It's ridiculous to include all from a group in the misdeeds of the few on top of said group.

Indeed, every president of the United States of America since the time of Kennedy has been bought and paid for by these international Zionist, and one can clearly see from the videos below that the truth is not found within American Presidents anymore.

Libya has been attacked, and soon will have a Rothschild controlled central bank, and this will leave The Sudan, Cuba, North Korea, and Iran as the only nations on Earth not affected by the very conspiracy that killed the last president of the United States of America, John Fitzgerald Kennedy.